“Just because you don’t know anybody from the right-hand side of the bell curve doesn’t mean they’re not there”
navigating the second Gilded Age through humor, invective and insight
“Just because you don’t know anybody from the right-hand side of the bell curve doesn’t mean they’re not there”
It’s been a l-o-n-g time since I posted anything here. The reasons for that are various…but since Jon Mays, the San Mateo Daily Journal editor said this is where I’m spending most of my time, I figure it’s time for the drought to end :). And what better way to do that than with an upbeat posting! This is an op ed I wrote which Jon published today. You may need a subscription to read it there.
I’m often in a minority among progressives because I am a staunch patriot. Granted, an objective reading of American history reveals many sad political choices, some of which were undeniably evil. But it also surfaces instances of noble decisions and sacrifices which made the world a better place.
This dichotomy between what we sometimes are and what we aspire to be has been with us since our founding. It’s clear many if not most of those who signed the Declaration of Independence were not interested in granting a seat at the table to anyone other than privileged white males. John Adams was astounded to learn the State of Pennsylvania was going to enfranchise some working men. He and the rest of the Continental Congress – which was exclusively male – also rejected the idea of including women. And preserving unity required staying silent on slavery, which at least some knew was evil.
But in their need to justify their rebellion — to potential allies leery of joining a British civil war, to the world at large, and to themselves – they stumbled upon a profound truth: that governments exist solely and only to serve the people who bring them into being, so as to assist the people in their pursuit of happiness.
This insight was, and remains, shockingly revolutionary. Even modern Americans often find the Declaration, stripped of its famous opening stanza, a disturbing challenge to the status quo.
And they are right to see it that way. Because the status quo generally favors the successful. That’s not automatically bad. But it can, all too often, lead to corruption and the curtailment of liberty.
That the founders may not have been as noble as many would like to see them doesn’t matter. Because they wrought better than they knew…while starting a fight that continues to this day. You can explain much of our often-bloody history as the struggle between what they wrote and the desire of those currently in power to retain their privileges and further their own interests. The revolution announced by the Declaration has never really ended…and, given human nature, it probably never can.
Whether it was Southern slavers asserting they could not be truly free unless they were free to own other human beings, or Gilded Age barons and later monopolists profiting from wage slaves, or those who made Blacks second-class citizens through Jim Crow laws, history shows we will never lack for people whose urge to dominate others to serve themselves knows no bounds. Which is why time and again Americans have had to fight, and will have to continue to fight, to preserve the promise at the heart of the Declaration. It’s the ultimate American cause…and it defines what it means to be an American.
Today the challenge is upon us once again, with an elected wannabe despot and his enablers doing things most Americans oppose, all in the name of protecting and preserving the nation. But more and more people are seeing through the subterfuge and are realizing the real goal is to create a system where freedom and happiness are only for those who toe a line set by their self-appointed betters. Who will also ensure the interests of those who helped put them in power are protected and enhanced, regardless of what that will mean for the rest of us.
Fortunately, a growing number of people remember those simple, self-evident truths, and are standing up to defend the real promise of America. It takes a lot to convince ordinary people to sacrifice their time – not to mention, sadly, their lives – to fight against injustice. The fact that so many are doing just that should give us all hope, and encourage those of us on the sidelines to join in. These brave souls reject jingoistic patriotism, in favor of the revolutionary vision that burst onto the world stage when the Declaration was published.
Those who would destroy America’s promise have been defeated before, more than once. And while their defeat too often involves bloodshed, it doesn’t require armed revolt. Everything that needs to be done can be done through the ballot box…provided we prevent those in power from destroying that ultimate guardrail.
We need to reject the false leaders currently in power and replace them with ones who understand true American leaders work for all the people, not just themselves and the few. If we do that, we can get the new birth of freedom so many crave…and ensure that government of the people, by the people, for the people, shall not perish from the earth.
mostly incoherently, but still…
“We’re gonna start a big investigation on [California’s high-speed rail project] because it’s — I’ve never seen anything like it. Nobody has ever seen anything like it. The worst overruns that there have ever been in the history of our country. And it wasn’t even necessary. I would have said, ‘You don’t buy it.’ You take an airplane — it costs you $2. It costs you nothing.”
For many reasons, I will never forget Mr. Muchio, who taught me algebra in the 7th grade.
One of the biggest challenges in learning algebra isn’t the math itself. It’s learning how to parse descriptions into mathematical equations you can then use the rules of algebra to solve. It’s a process of abstraction, figuring out what are the essential details and what is “merely” descriptive and/or reflective of a particular situation. This is commonly known as learning to solve word problems.
We quickly became masters of this…or thought we had.
As Mr. Muchio pointedly kept reminding us, what we were actually doing was leaving stuff out to overly simplify the problem. I still remember his admonition, decades later: “You’re using a silly rule: ‘when in doubt, leave it out’. But it means the problem you solve isn’t the one you were supposed to solve. Be careful about what you leave out!”
Once upon a time I was chief financial officer of a startup biotech company. One day my boss, the CEO, and I were traveling back to meet with investors to pitch them on why they really wanted to keep buying our stock.
During the flight I reviewed the financial models and presentation I’d spent days creating. Somewhere over the Midwest I suddenly realized several of the key summary values, which were central to my analysis, had gotten hard-coded. They didn’t reflect the revised assumptions I’d made.
This meant my beautiful and compelling pitch was completely wrong. In fact, we didn’t look like such a good investment after all.
Needless to say, I didn’t get much sleep that night. I had to revise everything.
Ever since, my Excel models are littered with “check figure” lines, that confirm totals are, in fact, reflective of the data they claim to summarize.
One of my earliest political memories was of Joe Namath, a very talented and famous quarterback in 1968, being asked who he thought should be our next President. I was 13 at the time.
I remember thinking “He’s a phenomenal quarterback. But why in the world would anyone think that’d make him an expert on national politics and the Presidential candidates?”
It takes a lot of time and effort — and focus — to become an expert in anything. Very few of us have the resources to do that in many different fields.
This spillover expertise effect really comes into play, at least in the United States, with business titans and governing.
Just because someone is successful in business, they don’t necessarily have a clue as to how to successfully lead a community in its pursuit of happiness and the greater good. Business, for all its challenges, is a much, much simpler environment to operate in than government. I know this from personal experience because I worked in each for 20 years, as a financial executive and as a local elected official.
In business, you succeed by focusing on making money while not breaking the rules. Or at least not breaking them too much.
In government, at least in a representative constitutional democracy, there is no single goal, and no marketplace in which to value tradeoffs from moment to moment. In fact, there’s often no market at all.
The Michelson–Morley experiment, which produced the data that overthrew Newtonian physics, was performed in 1887.
But it went unexplained until 1905, when Albert Einstein published the special theory of relativity.
What were the world’s physicists doing during those 18 years? Ignoring the data and hoping it would go away? Playing pinochle?
No, they were trying to jam the empirical data into Newtonian physics. Because that just had to be true! It’d successfully explained everything (well, almost everything) for centuries!
Once you accept the box you’re in, it’s damn hard to break out of it. Or even realize you’re in a box.

Ever wonder why research reports in Science, Nature, or any other scientific journal are terribly boring and hard to read?
It’s because the authors are required to disclose, fully, materials and methods, how they did their analysis, etc. They have to establish provenance, and reproducibility…both of which are key to critical thinking.
They only get to discuss what their results (might) mean in the last few bits.